Institution for Social and Policy Studies

Advancing Research • Shaping Policy • Developing Leaders

Voter Attitudes When Democracy Promotion Turns Partisan: Evidence From a Survey-Experiment in Lebanon

ISPS Data Archive: Terms of Use

By using, contributing, and/or downloading files associated with scholarly studies available on the ISPS Data Archive, you agree to these terms and conditions.

Please read the ISPS Data Archive Terms of Use.

Author(s): 

Nikolay Marinov

ISPS ID: 
D082
Research design: 
Data type: 
Survey
Data source(s): 

Author.

Data source information: 

Suggested citation: “Marinov, Nikolay (2012) Replication Materials for ”Voter Attitudes When Democracy Promotion Turns Partisan: Evidence From a Survey-Experiment in Lebanon,” http://hdl.handle.net/10079/pzgmspw; http://hdl.handle.net/10079/zgmsbqw; http://hdl.handle.net/10079/9p8cznb; http://hdl.handle.net/10079/tqjq2qf; http://hdl.handle.net/10079/k6djhpb. ISPS Data Archive.”

Field date: 
June 1, 2009
Location: 
Location details: 
Lebanon
Unit of observation: 
Individuals
Sample size: 
2,500
Inclusion/exclusion: 
Randomly selected adults from each of the country’s 30 administrative districts (cazas/qadas), with the sample proportional to the district population size. The pollsters sampled residents of the main town and two randomly selected villages in each district proportional to population size. Interviewers asked for the number of people above 18 in a household, chose the one with the most recent birthday (at the date of interview), and up to three follow-up visits were conducted if the respondent was not home, after which a new household was selected.
Randomization procedure: 
Respondents were assigned randomly to either a control group or one of a number of treatment groups.
Treatment: 
A survey prompt which includes a Party treatment, expressing support for a contestant in the elections, and a Process type, expressing support for the democratic process as a whole. The Party treatment reads that the intervening country ‘strongly preferred one side over the other’, whereas the Process treatment read that it ‘supported the democratic process, whatever the outcome of the elections’.
Treatment administration: 
Survey question
Outcome measures: 
Public opinion (satisfaction or disillusionment) with the country in question.
Archive date: 
2012
Archive contributor: 
Limor Peer
Owner: 
Author
Owner contact: 

isps(at)yale(dot)edu

Terms of use: 

Academic, non-commercial; see ISPS Terms of Use /data/data/login/isps-data-archive/

Discipline: 
Data file numbersort descending Description File format Size File url
D082F01 Data File Stata (12.0) .dta 93184 Download file
D082F02 Data File MS Excel .csv 113664 Download file
D082F03 Codebook XML (1.1) .xml 61440 Download file
D082F04 Program File Stata (12.0) .do 6144 Download file
D082F05 Program File R 4096 Download file
D082F06 Metadata record Adobe Acrobat (8.1) .pdf 201728 Download file