To Deceive or Not To Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments

Author(s): 

Julian Jamison, Dean Karlan, Laura Schechter

ISPS ID: 
ISPS08-014
Full citation: 
Jamison, Julian, Dean Karlan, Laura Schechter (2008) "To Deceive or Not To Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3-4): 477-488.
Abstract: 
Experimental economists believe (and enforce the idea) that researchers should not employ deception in the design of experiments. This rule exists in order to protect a public good: the ability of other researchers to conduct experiments and to have participants trust their instructions to be an accurate representation of the game being played. Yet other social sciences, particularly psychology, do not maintain such a rule. We examine whether such a public goods problem exists by purposefully deceiving some participants in one study, informing them of this fact, and then examining whether the deceived participants behave differently in a subsequent study.We find significant differences in the selection of individuals who return to play after being deceived as well as (to a lesser extent) the behavior in the subsequent games, thus providing qualified support for the proscription of deception. We discuss policy implications for the maintenance of separate participant pools.
Supplemental information: 

Link to article here.

Location: 
Publication date: 
2008
Publication type: 
Discipline: 
Area of study: