Peer Reviewed Article

Chat-IRB? How Application-Specific Language Models Can Enhance Research Ethics Review

Authors
  • Mateo Aboy
  • Brian D. Earp
  • Stephen Latham
  • Sebastian Porsdam Mann
  • Julian Savulescu
  • Jiehao Joel Seah
Published
August 19, 2025
Publication
Journal of Medical Ethics
Discipline
Areas of Study
Document Control Number(s)
  • ISPS 25-48
Citation

Porsdam Mann S, Seah JJ, Latham S, Savulescu J, Aboy M, Earp BD. Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review. J Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 19:jme-2025-110845. doi: 10.1136/jme-2025-110845. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40764013.

Abstract

Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a crucial role in ensuring the ethical conduct of human subjects research, but face challenges including inconsistency, delays, and inefficiencies. We propose the development and implementation of application-specific large language models (LLMs) to facilitate IRB review processes. These IRB-specific LLMs would be fine-tuned on IRB-specific literature and institutional datasets, and equipped with retrieval capabilities to access up-to-date, context-relevant information. We outline potential applications, including pre-review screening, preliminary analysis, consistency checking, and decision support. While addressing concerns about accuracy, context sensitivity, and human oversight, we acknowledge remaining challenges such as over-reliance on artificial intelligence and the need for transparency. By enhancing the efficiency and quality of ethical review while maintaining human judgement in critical decisions, IRB-specific LLMs offer a promising tool to improve research oversight. We call for pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and impact of this approach.

Description

Supplemental:

Full original article

Related Data:

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.