Peer Reviewed Article

Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee

Authors
  • Kevin Arceneaux
  • Daniel R. Biggers
  • Cheryl Boudreau
  • Conor Dowling
  • Alan Gerber
  • David J. Hendry
  • Sunshine Hillygus
  • Thomas Palfrey
Published
October 15, 2014
Publication
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Discipline
Areas of Study
Document Control Number(s)
  • ISPS 14-029
Citation

Alan Gerber, Kevin Arceneaux, Cheryl Boudreau, Conor Dowling, Sunshine Hillygus, Thomas Palfrey, Daniel R. Biggers and David J. Hendry (2014). Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(1): 81-98.
doi:10.1017/xps.2014.11

Abstract

The Standards Committee of the Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association has produced reporting guidelines that aim to increase the clarity of experimental research reports. This paper describes the Committee’s rationale for the guidelines it developed and includes our Recommended Reporting Standards for Experiments (Laboratory, Field, Survey). It begins with a content analysis of current reporting practices in published experimental research. Although researchers report most important aspects of their experimental designs and data, we find substantial omissions that could undermine the clarity of research practices and the ability of researchers to assess the validity of study conclusions. With the need for reporting guidelines established, the report describes the process the Committee used to develop the guidelines, the feedback received during the comment period, and the rationale for the final version of the guidelines

Description

Supplemental:

Full original article