Essays and Commentary

Reporting Balance Tables, Response Rates and Manipulation Checks in Experimental Research: A Reply from the Committee that Prepared the Reporting Guidelines

Authors
  • Kevin Arceneaux
  • Cheryl Boudreau
  • Conor Dowling
  • Alan S. Gerber
  • D. Sunshine Hillygus
Published
January 12, 2016
Publication
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Discipline
Areas of Study
Document Control Number(s)
  • ISPS 15-34
Citation

Gerber, A., Arceneaux, K., Boudreau, C., Dowling, C., & Hillygus, D. (2015). Reporting Balance Tables, Response Rates and Manipulation Checks in Experimental Research: A Reply from the Committee that Prepared the Reporting Guidelines. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2): 216-229. DOI:10.1017/XPS.2015.20.

Abstract

We welcome the comments on our committee’s Reporting Guidelines (2014, Journal of Experimental Political Science 7 1(1): 81–98) from Diana Mutz and Robin
Pemantle, as well as the opportunity to clarify our recommendations. We appreciate the points they raise and share their goal of encouraging a better understanding of
experimental methods. Nonetheless, we are not in complete agreement with their proposed revisions to our recommendations.

Description

Supplemental:

Full original article