Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support


Daniel M. Butler and Jessica Robinson Preece

Full citation: 
Butler, Daniel M. and Jessica Robinson Preece (2016). Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support. Political Research Quarterly 69(4): 842– 851. DOI: 10.1177/1065912916668412.
Gender differences in who gets recruited by political party elites contribute to women’s underrepresentation on the ballot, but recent evidence suggests that even when women are recruited to the same extent as men, they are still less likely to be interested in seeking office. Why do men and women respond differently to invitations to seek office? We hypothesize that women view party recruitment as a weaker signal of informal support than men do. We use a survey experiment on a sample of 3,640 elected municipal officeholders—themselves prospective recruits for higher office—to test this. We find that female respondents generally believe party leaders will provide female recruits less strategic and financial support than male recruits. In other words, even when elites recruit women, women are skeptical that party leaders will use their political and social capital on their behalf. This difference may account for many women’s lukewarm responses to recruitment.
Supplemental information: 

Link to article here.

Publication date: 
Publication type: 
Publication name: