Peer Reviewed Article

The Effects of Lawn Signs on Vote Outcomes: Results from Four Randomized Field Experiments

Authors
  • Alexander Coppock
  • Benjamin D. Farrer
  • Donald P. Green
  • Jonathan S. Krasno
  • Brandon Lenoird
  • Joshua N. Zinghere
Published
March 31, 2016
Publication
Electoral Studies
Discipline
Areas of Study
Geographic Areas
Document Control Number(s)
  • ISPS 16-23
Citation

Green, Donald P., Jonathan S. Krasno, Alexander Coppock, Benjamin D. Farrer, Brandon Lenoird, & Joshua N. Zinghere (2016). The Effects of Lawn Signs on Vote Outcomes: Results from Four Randomized Field Experiments. Electoral Studies, 41: 143-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.002.

Abstract

Although lawn signs rank among the most widely used campaign tactics, little scholarly attention has been paid to the question of whether they actually generate votes. Working in collaboration with a congressional candidate, a mayoral candidate, an independent expenditure campaign directed against a gubernatorial candidate, and a candidate for county commissioner, we tested the effects of lawn signs by planting them in randomly selected voting precincts. Electoral results pooled over all four studies suggest that signs increased advertising candidates’ vote shares. Results also provide some evidence that the effects of lawn signs spill over into adjacent untreated voting precincts.

Description

Supplemental:

Full original article

Related Data:

The data and replication scripts for these experiments are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/K2TLDB.