Data

Welcome to the ISPS Data Archive!

The ISPS Data Archive consists primarily of social science research based on experiments. The Archive is organized by study and includes the data, analysis code, requisite documentation, and other associated materials. All published materials have been reviewed to enable long-term usability. Read about our approach to curating for reproducibility. Access to the ISPS Data Archive is provided at no cost and is granted for scholarship and research purposes only.

ISPS Data Archive: Terms of Use

By using, contributing, and/or downloading files associated with scholarly studies available on the ISPS Data Archive, you agree to these terms and conditions. Please read the ISPS Data Archive Terms of Use.

Title Author(s) Year archivedsort ascending
When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments

Graeme Blair, Alexander Coppock, Maggie Moor

Does Publicizing a Tax Credit for Political Contributions Increase Its Use?: Results From a Randomized Field Experiment

Robert G. Boatright, Donald P. Green, Michael J. Malbin

Comparing Experimental and Matching Methods Using a Large-Scale Voter Mobilization Experiment

Kevin Arceneaux, Alan S. Gerber, Donald P. Green

Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment

Daniel Butler, David W. Nickerson

Seeing the State in Action: Public Preferences About and Judgments of Common Police–Civilian Interactions

Paige Vaughn, Gregory Huber

Does Knowledge of Constitutional Principles Increase Support for Civil Liberties? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment

Donald P. Green, Peter Aronow, Daniel Bergan, Pamela Greene, Celia Paris, Beth I. Weinberger

The Small Effects of Political Advertising are Small Regardless of Context, Message, Sender, or Receiver: Evidence From 59 Real-time Randomized Experiments

Alexander Coppock, Seth J. Hill, Lynn Vavreck

Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation

Susan D. Hyde, Nikolay Marinov

The 2008 Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project (CCAP)

Simon Jackman, Lynn Vavreck

Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation

Alan S. Gerber, Donald P. Green

A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check

Peter Aronow, Jonathon Baron, Lauren Pinson

Testing the Efficacy of Three Informational Interventions for Reducing Misperceptions of the Black–White Wealth Gap

Bennett Callaghan, Leilah Harouni, Cydney H. Dupree, Michael Kraus, Jennifer Richeson

Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification

Alan S. Gerber, Gregory Huber, David Doherty, Conor M. Dowling

Changes in Candidate Evaluations over the Campaign Season: A Comparison of House, Senate, and Presidential Races

Patrick Tucker, Steven Smith

Self-Prophecy Effects and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Replication

Jennifer K. Smith, Alan S. Gerber, Anton Orlich

Do Perceptions of Ballot Secrecy Influence Turnout? Results from a Field Experiment

Alan S. Gerber, Gregory Huber, David Doherty, Conor M. Dowling, Seth J. Hill

The (Identification) Cards You Are Dealt: Biased Treatment of Anglos and Latinos Using Municipal-Issued versus Unofficial ID Cards

Ruth K. Ditlmann, Paul Lagunes

Do Robotic Calls from Credible Sources Influence Voter Turnout or Vote Choice? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Daron R. Shaw, Donald P. Green, James G. Gimpel, Alan S. Gerber

Targeted Abortion Frames Do Not Mobilize Political Action-Taking

Natalie Hernandez, Nicholas Ottone, Joshua L. Kalla

The Impact of Electoral Debate on Public Opinions: An Experimental Investigation of the 2005 New York City Mayoral Election

Sendhil Mullainathan, Ebonya Washington, Julia Azari